Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print Aug 4 2008
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7841

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, N. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, N. E.

Received February 29, 2008
Accepted May 22, 2008

Concurrent Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Is Not More Effective Than Concurrent Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Operable Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E 2197

Lori J. Goldstein,* Anne O'Neill, Joseph A. Sparano, Edith A. Perez, Lawrence N. Shulman, Silvana Martino, and Nancy E. Davidson

From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; and the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lori.goldstein{at}fccc.edu

Purpose: The combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is a standard adjuvant regimen. Doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) is one of the most active cytotoxic regimens for metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of this trial was to determine whether adjuvant AT improved disease-free survival compared with AC in operable breast cancer.

Patients and Methods: Women with invasive breast cancer were eligible if there were one to three positive lymph nodes or if the node-negative tumor was greater than 1 cm. Patients were randomly assigned after surgery to receive doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) plus either cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2; AC) or docetaxel (60 mg/m2; AT) given every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by hormone therapy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)–positive tumors.

Results: There were 2,882 eligible patients enrolled. After a median follow-up of 79.5 months, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS; 85% in both arms) or overall survival (91% v 92%) at 5 years. The hazard ratio for AC versus AT was 1.02 (95% CI for DFS, 0.86 to 1.22; P = .78). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified stratification factors by ER and PR expression there were trends toward improved DFS for AT in ER/PR-negative disease. Grade 3 neutropenia associated with fever or infection occurred more often with AT (26% v 10%; P < .05).

Conclusion: AT did not improve DFS or overall survival in this population, and was associated with more toxicity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Oncology and HematologyHome page
Insights from a Negative Result
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, September 16, 2008; 2008(916): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online